Comparison
Fire your marketing agency.
We lead with an AI-first stack that handles attribution, optimization, and client acquisition end-to-end. Agencies dress up the same junior-account-manager service as “AI-powered” — without the proprietary tech behind it.
Marketing agenciesLegacy
Directory sitesPay-to-play
Tracked from ad click to signed retainer — always visible in your dashboard.
“We'll send you a clicks report and call it a day.”
No attribution past the directory profile view.
AI efficiency = lower overhead. More of your spend reaches the channels — not the org chart.
Paying agency markup for junior account managers learning on your dime.
Annual listing fee plus per-lead charges. Same leads sold to nearby firms.
AI-first stack: specialized AI agents for ads, intake, attribution, content — built in-house.
Manual workflows, legacy tools, “AI-washed” reports retrofitted onto agency processes.
Template profile page and a contact form. No optimization beyond the directory itself.
Run by AI agents and human experts — 24/7 tuning, weekly creative refresh, never on autopilot.
Checked when the account manager remembers. Stale creative, outdated playbooks.
No optimization. You bid against other listed firms for the same eyeballs.
Exclusive to your firm. Generated by your campaigns, owned by you.
Yours, if the campaign performs. But the agency owns the playbook, not you.
Shared. The same inquiry is often sold to three or four firms in your geo.
Month-to-month. Stay for the results, not because of the paperwork.
3–12 month minimums. Stay because you have to, even when results underperform.
Annual listing contracts, auto-renewal clauses, fees if you cancel mid-term.
We earn your business every month. If we're not, you're free to go.
Pay and hope. Quarterly reviews where the agency explains why next quarter will be different.
Pay and pray. You're one of dozens of listings; no one's accountable to your number.
